After the news hit about Time Warner Cable’s intent to charge different rates for tiers of monthly data transfer — and an enormous $1/GB fee for overages — it seems eminently sane to consider the competition.
In Rochester, that competition is Frontier DSL. For a long time, that basically meant there was no competition, I’m very sorry to say.
However, the changes to TWC’s fee structure may be so extreme that even that level of competition is good. While I don’t think our household monthly data transfer is excessive, I’m reasonably sure (based on what I’ve seen from the data I’ve collected from our broadband router) that we’ll blow right past the 5 GB/month tier and maybe the 10 GB/month one. We would have to — and by that I mean, I would have to, really — develop some more austere usage of the family Internet connection that we’re accustomed to. Thus, I’m examining the pro and con positions for Frontier’s high-speed Internet service.
Pro
With Frontier DSL, my family should:
- Not have to deal with the stress of the upcoming 5/10/40/100 GB-per-month tiers from TWC, which will reportedly take effect in Rochester in November 2009
- Get to send a clear message to TWC that metered Internet access is a terrible idea
- Get the peace of mind that unlimited, unmetered Internet access provides — but only if Frontier’s existing 5 GB-per-month transfer cap is eliminated
- Benefit from the refer-a-friend affiliate program — both parties get the $20 referral credit
- Be able to combine the billing with our Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS).
Con
However, there are some drawbacks to Frontier DSL. My family would be concerned about:
- A potential monthly DSL modem rental fee
- A two-year commitment with a $200-300 (I’ve see both figures!) early termination fee
- The 5 GB-per-month unenforced data transfer cap (but that cap may be dropped entirely in an effort to better compete with TWC)
- Blocking port 25 — while there are workarounds, this is just aggravating
- The unknown quantity of Frontier’s technical support, whereas TWC’s has been reasonably good over the years.
Anyway, while we’re mulling this over, the news is playing out on sites like StopTheCap and StopTWC! Meanwhile, I’m more than a little annoyed at the traditional news media avoiding some of the other angles surrounding this topic — the pricing change as a way to protect cable television revenues, the local monopoly (and how cable infrastructure compares to its telephone equivalent), the impact on increasingly Internet-dependent households during a recession, how this might change the habits of people (including employees working at home), and so on.